World

News live: parents of Australian surfers killed in Mexico fly in for trial; Labor pressured to toughen lobbying rules | Anthony Albanese

Parents of Australian surfers killed in Mexico fly in for trial

The parents of Australian brothers Callum and Jake Robinson, who were killed in Mexico in 2024, will fly to Ensenada to attend the aggravated homicide trial of their accused killers.

The two surfers, aged 33 and 30, and their friend, Jack Carter Rhoad, 30, a US citizen, had been camping in a remote beachside area when they were killed in what investigators believe was an attempt to steal their vehicle.

Writing on Facebook, Debra and Martin Robinson said attending the trial felt “overwhelmingly difficult” but that “being in that courtroom is one of the last things we can do for Callum and Jake”.

double quotation markWe are going because we need to be there, not only for ourselves, but to represent the immense love, heartbreak and unimaginable loss felt by their families, friends and everyone who loved these three extraordinary young men.

We want to hear the truth. We want to understand what happened. And most importantly, we want to be their voices, because they can no longer speak for themselves.

In 2025, a Mexican court sentenced a woman to 20 years in prison for her involvement in the incident.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Emma Elsworthy

The independent member for Curtin, Kate Chaney, will put forward a bill to establish Australia’s first legislated mandatory framework for the use of automated decision-making in government this week.

The use of the controversial tool within the aged care sector has affected hundreds of applications for out-of-home care.

Almost one-fifth of older Australians who contested their algorithm-determined Support at Home funding allocation had a higher level of support or higher priority allocated once a human reviewed the decision.

Chaney said there was no transparency in government about how widely used automated decision-making tools are. She told ABC Radio National:

double quotation markIt’s not clear if there’s a human who can actually apply a common sense overlay to these decisions. And it’s not clear how you can review these if they’re made by a computer.

So the bill that I’m introducing today would actually create a mandatory framework that applies whenever government is using an automated system to make a decision that affects people’s significant rights and would require those three things to be addressed: transparency, human oversight, and review.


Source link

Back to top button