Diddy’s lawyers claim that voyeurism does not count as prostitution

ClearlyThe hearing about his motion to have the Mann ACT – declarations throw away, started only a short time ago … and his lawyers take their argument from legal movements to real life – waste in a court in New York City.

The Legal Team of De Rapper – led by Marc Agnifilo – Start their argument by repeating the judge what they have previously stated in legal articles … Prostitution means a person who pays to have sex with another person. They insist that it does not refer to someone who pays to see how two people have sex like Diddy did.

However, public prosecutors responded by pointing out that Diddy was not only going somewhere and sitting in a box to see how two people do it … They say that he reimbursed his ex-girlfriend to arrange sexual encounters and derived sexual satisfaction himself.

Public prosecutors also add that the charges cannot come up with a matter of freedom of expression – in a pornography – sentence – because not every sexual meeting was filmed.

Diddy’s lawyers shot back by claiming that it was usually filmed. They also say that Diddy was involved in amateur pornography that they say is not a crime.

Diddy’s team also attacked the basis of the Mann Act … The mention of an old, racist judges who have spoken out indignation in the last 100 years.

As you know … Diddy’s lawyers, his family and prosecutors all rolled up to the courtroom Shortly before the hearing to find out if the 2 Mann ACT judgments are being thrown or whether he gets a different process.