Nar, News Corp. rejected from the main fraud suit
Earlier this month, Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Nar rejected, together with News Corp. And Movement subsidiaries Move Sales, Inc., Opcity, Inc., Opcity Acquisition, LLC, RinAnd Realize from the suit.
According to the submission, both News Corp. If Nar rejected due to a lack of personal jurisdiction, which means that they did not have enough connections with California, where the lawsuit was filed. Nar was recorded in Illinois and News Corp. is included in Delaware. The subsidiaries were rejected due to a lack of status, which means that claimants have not demonstrated in their complaint how these defendants have caused them directly damage.
The parties submitted their motions to reject the lawsuit in January 2025.
While these defendants were fired, the judge did not reject them with prejudice, which means that Bandy can reform claims against these defendants if he chooses.
Not rejected from the court case was moving itself, which the court ordered, the claims of the claimants must arbitrate. According to the ruling, the claimants agreed to arbitrate possible claims with movement when they register for his lead generation service as part of the general terms and conditions. The submission notes that comparable arbitration agreements were enforced in Silverman v. Move Inc. and Herkenrath v. Move Inc.
Originally submitted in August 2024 by James Bandy, together with 12 other real estate professional claimants, claims the lawsuit, which strived the status of the Class Action that movement made the wrong representation of the quality of the leads that are provided to Connections Plus subscribers.
